The Third Factor in Phonology
Keywords: evolution of language, phonology, third factor
AbstractThis article attempts to investigate how much of phonology can be explained by properties of general cognition and the Sensorimotor system â€” in other words, third-factor principles, in support of the evolutionary scenario posed by Hauser et al. (2002a). It argues against Pinker & Jackendoffâ€™s (2005: 212) claim that â€œmajor characteristics of phonology are specific to language (or to language & music), [and] uniquely human,â€ and their conclusion that â€œphonology represents a major counterexample to the recursion-only hypothesis.â€ Contrary to the statements by Anderson (2004) and Yip (2006a, 2006b) to the effect that phonology has not been tested in animals, it is shown that virtually all the abilities that underlie phonological competence have been shown in other species.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons CC-BY License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).